MedWhat's request to replace a judge hearing the case against Stanford-StartX Fund has been refused and the company has been ordered to pay costs for blocking discovery.

The bitter legal feud between Stanford-StartX Fund and virtual medical assistant developer MedWhat has taken another twist after the latter demanded the withdrawal of a judge hearing the case, Analytics Insight reported yesterday. The court reportedly refused a motion from Arturo Devesa, CEO of MedWhat, demanding it should remove its part-time pro tem assistant, Jeff…

The rest of this content is only accessible to University Venturing: News, Data, and Events - Global University Venturing Subscribers.

This content is only accessible to subscribers. If you are a subscriber, please sign in. Otherwise, if you would like to try before you buy and haven't previously taken out a free trial, you can do so below. You can also see details on subscriptions by clicking the Subscription Options button.