MedWhat's request to replace a judge hearing the case against Stanford-StartX Fund has been refused and the company has been ordered to pay costs for blocking discovery.

The bitter legal feud between Stanford-StartX Fund and virtual medical assistant developer MedWhat has taken another twist after the latter demanded the withdrawal of a judge hearing the case, Analytics Insight reported yesterday.
The court reportedly refused a motion from Arturo Devesa, CEO of MedWhat, demanding it should remove its part-time pro tem assistant, Jeff Wohl, owing to alleged conflicts of interest with the university.
Instead, head judge Ethan Schulman apparently opted to enforce Wohl’s “motion to compel”…

Subscribe to go deeper

GCV subscribers get access to all our proprietary data and deep-dive articles, as well as the global directory of CVC investors.



Not sure if you have a subscription?